VERIFIABLE WORK INFRASTRUCTURE

Physical work,
proved.

A completed work order is only a claim. WorkProof turns field evidence into a verifiable Proof Contract—so asset owners can accept work, release payment, and retain a defensible audit trail.

For facilities teams, asset owners, insurers, marketplaces, and organisations that pay for outsourced physical work.

ILLUSTRATIVE PRODUCT DATAPC-0491-218772

PROOF CERTIFICATE

Completion decision

Work order
WO-218772
Site
Store 0491
Asset
KES-02
Policy
EXHAUST-CLOSEOUT v1.3
Current stateHUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED
Missing evidenceReadable service-label capture
1Scope2Contract3Evidence4Claims5Certificate6Payment

THE ACCEPTANCE GAP

Photos are not proof.

A work order describes what should happen. A contractor report describes what someone says happened. A folder containing thirty-seven photographs still leaves the buyer to decide whether the right work was completed on the right asset, under the required policy.

CURRENT WORKFLOW

01Job marked complete
02Unstructured photos uploaded
03Reviewer searches for evidence
04Missing view discovered
05Technician has already left
06Invoice delayed

WITH WORKPROOF

01Scope compiled into claims
02Correct evidence captured on site
03Claims verified individually
04Uncertainty routed to a human
05Certificate issued
06Downstream action proceeds
WorkProof does not ask AI whether a job “looks good.”
It determines whether each required claim is adequately supported.
FOR BUYERSDefensible, consistent acceptance.
FOR SERVICE PROVIDERSExplicit criteria, fewer evidence-led rejections, fewer avoidable return visits, and potentially faster invoice approval.

INTERACTIVE PROTOTYPE

Run a Proof Contract

See how WorkProof decomposes a physical job into independently verifiable claims.

8 CLAIMSPOLICY EXHAUST-CLOSEOUT v1.3
CLM-01Correct site and asset identifiedSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Geofence, asset marker, work-order match
Evidence received
3 observations
Confidence
Deterministic match
Supporting observation
Store 0491 · KES-02 · capture session 00:00
Human review
No
CLM-02Pre-work condition documentedSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Required pre-work views
Evidence received
6 images
Confidence
High
Supporting observation
Plenum, fan, duct and access-panel views
Human review
No
CLM-03Required components and surfaces coveredSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Policy coverage map
Evidence received
12 images + 2 observations
Confidence
High
Supporting observation
Coverage map complete for accessible surfaces
Human review
No
CLM-04Access panels restoredSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Post-work closure views
Evidence received
3 images
Confidence
High
Supporting observation
All three recorded panels shown closed
Human review
No
CLM-05Post-work condition documentedSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Paired post-work views + provenance
Evidence received
8 images
Confidence
High
Supporting observation
Paired views captured in the active session
Human review
No
CLM-06Service label installed and readableUNSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Readable label with date and provider
Evidence received
No qualifying image
Confidence
Insufficient evidence
Supporting observation
Label view missing from the capture session
Human review
Required
CLM-07Inaccessible or excluded areas declaredSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Signed exception declaration
Evidence received
1 declaration
Confidence
Deterministic match
Supporting observation
No exclusions declared
Human review
No
CLM-08No duplicate or replayed evidence detectedSUPPORTED+
Required evidence
Media provenance and similarity checks
Evidence received
29 checks
Confidence
No anomaly
Supporting observation
No prior-job or within-session duplicate found
Human review
No
1Scope2Proof Contract3Captured evidence4Claim decisions5Certificate6Payment

A foundation model may interpret evidence, but a Proof Contract defines what evidence is required, which thresholds apply, when the system must abstain, and who can approve an exception.

TRUST CERTIFICATE

A defensible record of why work was accepted.

The certificate preserves the scope, policy, evidence, verification path, exceptions, and authority behind the final decision.

A model conclusion without evidence lineage is not eligible for automatic acceptance.

ILLUSTRATIVE COMPLETION CERTIFICATE

Work completed under
PC-0491-218772

Certificate ID
CERT-0491-0725
Work-order ID
WO-218772
Site / asset
Store 0491 / KES-02
Service provider
Northline Service Co. · illustrative
Technician identity
Capture identity confirmed
Proof Contract
EXHAUST-CLOSEOUT v1.3
Customer policy
FAC-ACCEPT v2.1
Capture period
14:02:18–14:41:06 UTC
Verified claims
8 of 8 supported
Unresolved exceptions
None
Human reviewer
Not required
Model versions
VISION-04 / OCR-02
Decision timestamp
2026-07-25 14:42:19 UTC
Evidence hashes
29 preserved
Final state
ACCEPTED
Permitted action
Invoice approval
FINAL ACCEPTANCE STATEACCEPTED

THE CATEGORY DISTINCTION

The value is not seeing the photograph.
The value is knowing what decision the evidence can support.

AI PHOTO INSPECTION

Image in. Score out.

  • Examines individual images
  • Produces a score or description
  • Often lacks contractual context
  • Usually ends at a dashboard
  • Difficult to connect to liability
  • Easy to copy as a feature

WORKPROOF

Intent in. Defensible action out.

  • Begins with a buyer-defined Proof Contract
  • Verifies individual claims
  • Preserves capture provenance
  • Detects missing and replayed evidence
  • Abstains when confidence is insufficient
  • Routes exceptions to authorized reviewers
  • Produces a traceable certificate
  • Connects the decision to payment, warranty, audit, or reimbursement

INITIAL WEDGE · GENERAL PROTOCOL

Built for consequential physical workflows.

The first wedge is facilities maintenance. The platform is designed for every consequential physical workflow.

A

Multi-site facilities

Kitchen exhaust · HVAC · Refrigeration · Fire doors and dampers · Grease traps · Backflow testing

Consistent acceptance criteria across locations and service providers.

B

Warranty and reimbursement

Equipment replacement · Solar commissioning · EV chargers · Energy rebates · Disaster restoration

Verify that reimbursable or warrantable work satisfies the required evidence policy.

C

Infrastructure and utilities

Street lighting · Water systems · Telecommunications · Remediation · Road maintenance

Create asset-level evidence histories for distributed physical work.

D

Marketplaces and service networks

Neutral assurance across buyers, providers, and platforms

Add completion assurance without turning the marketplace into an auditor, insurer, or specialist inspection company.

TRUST ARCHITECTURE

Designed for consequential decisions.

Architectural principles for a verification system—not claims of completed certifications.

01

Claim-level verification

Every decision resolves to explicit claims and supporting evidence.

02

Conservative automation

Acceptance uses calibrated precision and coverage—not a generic model score.

03

Explicit abstention

Uncertainty becomes a review task rather than an invented answer.

04

Evidence provenance

Live capture is distinguished from imported or historical media.

05

Anti-replay controls

Duplicate, previously submitted, and suspiciously reproduced evidence can be identified.

06

Versioned policy

Every decision records the relevant Proof Contract, policy, and model versions.

07

Human authority

Authorized reviewers retain control over expert and safety-critical decisions.

08

Auditable lineage

A certificate traces back to the exact evidence and decision process.

ASSUMPTION MODEL

Estimate the cost of manual closeout review.

Change every input. The model shows its arithmetic and does not assume platform pricing.

ANNUAL ILLUSTRATIVE ESTIMATE

Administrative cost potentially avoided$26,400480 reviewer hours potentially avoided
Proofable work orders6,000locations × jobs
Current reviewer hours800orders × minutes ÷ 60
Current review cost$44,000hours × hourly cost
Eligible for auto-acceptance3,600orders × coverage
Return visits potentially avoided72returns × assumed reduction
Return-visit cost potentially avoided$12,960visits avoided × cost

Illustrative estimate based entirely on the assumptions entered above. It is not a WorkProof performance guarantee or customer result.

THE LONG VIEW

A common language for verifiable physical work.

Today, a human reads a work order, performs a job, uploads photographs, and waits for someone else to interpret them.

Tomorrow, a Proof Contract can coordinate humans, contractors, drones, robots, sensors, insurers, auditors, and payment systems around the same definition of acceptable work.

01Intent02Proof Contract03Human / Robot / Agent04Evidence05Verification06Certificate07Payment / Warranty / Audit

WorkProof is building the trust infrastructure through which physical work can be accepted, paid, warranted, audited, and eventually delegated to machines.

Design a Proof Pilot